Comments to USTR Opposing Tariffs and Tariff Increases
The United States Trade Representative invited comments from the public this past month to assist them in making recommendations about how to address so-called “unfair trade practices by other countries” and “non-reciprocal trade relationships”. This is the public comment I left today on the USTR docket. I have also submitted similar comments to my senators and representative in Congress.
“I am deeply alarmed by the Trump administration’s decision last week to impose tariffs on Canadian and Mexican goods, as well as further increase tariffs on imports from China. As the CEO of Great Scott Gadgets, a small Colorado-based business that designs, manufactures, and distributes open-source computer hardware to domestic and international resellers, I am directly impacted by these policies. The total tariff on the goods we import from China has now skyrocketed to 45%, placing an unsustainable burden on our company.
Our business relies on a stable global supply chain, free trade, and strong relationships with resellers and suppliers worldwide—relationships that have taken over a decade to build. The imposition of these tariffs jeopardizes our company as well as countless other US businesses that depend on international trade. Tariffs will not only damage the U.S. economy but have already deeply strained our relationships with our closest allies and trading partners.
The reality is that technology companies like ours depend on China’s well-established supply chain, advanced manufacturing infrastructure, and specialized technical expertise, resources that are in critically short supply in the U.S. The Section 301 tariffs imposed in 2018 have already harmed our business, yet they did nothing to create viable alternatives. Raising these tariffs further will not miraculously generate the resources needed to shift manufacturing away from China; it will only worsen the damage.
The administration attempts to justify more tariffs on Chinese goods by pointing out the U.S.-China trade deficit, but this deficit is not China’s fault—it is the result of decades of inadequate U.S. investment in technical education, supply chain infrastructure, and domestic manufacturing capacity. If the U.S. wants to compete, we are going to have to commit to long-term, strategic investments in these areas, as China’s government has been doing for a generation. The CHIPS Act was a step in the right direction, but its benefits will take many more years to materialize. In the meantime, businesses like ours are being pushed to the brink.”